PRANATA SOSIAL DAN PEMBENTUKAN DIRI HOMOSEKSUAL TOKOH KUSAKABE HIKARU DALAM MANGA DOUKYUUSEI KARYA NAKAMURA ASUMIKO

Authors

  • Widya Fahrani Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Tienn Immery Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Irma Universitas Bung Hatta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37301/hikari.v1i1.7

Keywords:

Manga; Character; Homosexual; Self Formation; Social Institution

Abstract

This research chose Doukyuusei vol 1-3 manga by Nakamura Asumiko because it depicts the stage of homosexual self formation of Kusakabe Hikaru. The stage of homosexual self formation of the figure in the story relates to the social institution that exists in society. The method used in this research is Qulitative and presented descriptively and data collection techniques using literature studies. The theory used is that social institution is related to the social background and stage of homosexual self formation by Vivinnie Cass. The results showed Kusakabe's figures fulfilled four stages of the six stages of homosexual self formation. The four stages are Identity Confusion, Identity Comparation, Identity Acceptance, and Identity Synthesis. Identity Confusion stage is related to educational institutions (non-academic curriculum). Identity Comparison relates to religious institutions (ethics). Identity Acceptance relates to religious institutions (ethics). Identity Synthesis is related to the family institutions (marriage) and religious institutions (ethics). In conclusion, Kusakabe did not go through the Identity Tolerance because he did not look for homosexual groups and the Identity Pride because Kusakabe did not think heterosexual was the wrong thing. Although Kusakabe managed to come out as a homosexual, social institutions would not approve of homosexual behavior.

References

Anwar, Siti Dahsiar. 2004. “Cara Berpikir Orang Jepang: Sebuah Perspektif Budhisme”. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, 8 (3), 120-125.

Bitar. 2019. “Pengertian PranataSosial”. [http://www.gurupendidikan.co.id/pranatasosial/ (10 Juni 2020) ]

Cas, Vivienne. C. 1979. “Homosexual Identity Information a Theoretical Model Jurnal of Homosexuality” dalam [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v04n03_01(7 Sempember 2020)]

Ito, Kinko. 2005. “A History of Mangainthe Context of Japanese Culture and Society”.Jurnal Of Popular Culture. Vol. 38(3). 456-475.

Lexy J. Moleong. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Minderop, Albertine. 2010. Psikologi Sastra: Karya, Metode, Teori, dan Contoh Kasus. Jakarta: Buku Obor.

Nakamura, Asumiko. 2008. ???First season. Tokyo: Edge Comic.

Nakamura, Asumiko. 2010. ???2nd season. Tokyo: Edge Comic.

Nakamura, Asumiko. 2010. ???3rd season. Tokyo: Edge Comic.

Nasution, Ratna Novita Sari. 2017. “Fenomena LGBT dalam masyarakat Jepang dewasa ini”. Skripsi. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2007. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pagan, Amanda. 2019. “A Beginner's Guide to LGBTQ+ Manga”. [https://www.nypl.org/blog/2019/06/17/beginners-guide-lgbtq-manga. (6 Juli 2020)]

Santosa, Agus. 2009. “Pengertian Pranata Sosial, Jenis, Ciri, Fungsi, Bentuk & Contoh”. [https://www.gurupendidikan.co.id/pranata-sosial/ (20 Januari 2021)].

Schodt, Frederik L. 2011. Dreamland Writings on Modern Manga Japan. California: Stone Bridgre Press.

Siyoto, Sandu. dan Ali Sodik. 2015. Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media.

Wiyatmi. 2011. Psikologi Sastra Teori dan Aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: Kanwa publisher.

Wood, Toni Jhonson. 2010. Manga an Anthology of Global and Cultural Prespective. New York: Continuum.

Zanghellini, Aleardo. 2009. Boys Love in anime and manga: Japanese subcultural Production. Continuum : Jurnal of Media & Cultural Sudies. Sydney. Vol 23(3).279-294

Additional Files

Published

2021-11-09